Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Alan Grayson Grills Slimy Fed Lawyer
He looks like a pretty big moron here. It doesn't seem like he knows what the Fed does at all.
Fear Mongering About Health Care Reform From The Right Wing
>> ^Yogi:
QM is right though, it is not a question of Right versus Left. It's about democratic control, we haven't had it, and we're not getting it. We have to demand it.
What is a more democratic version of health care than having a democratic government running health care?
Yogi (Member Profile)
In reply to this comment by Yogi:
QM is right though, it is not a question of Right versus Left. It's about democratic control, we haven't had it, and we're not getting it. We have to demand it.
It would seem to me the most democratic way to run health care is to have a democratic government run it.
Dan Savage Owns Right Wing Bigot Tony Perkins On Prop 8
>> ^Aemaeth:
Ironic to make threats against others while claiming to be oppressed.
I think you missed the part where he talked about people firebombing gay bars and hate crimes against homosexuals that lead to death. I would take graffiti over that kind of protest any day.
Fanboy demands his Smash Brothers!
*satire
Zero Punctuation - The World Ends with You
I think there is more dialogue in Western RPGs than JRPGs but everything else he says about JRPGs is right on the money.
Chomsky was smart before he became a looney (vs Buckley)
I agree with the OP that the smarmy Buckley won this one. When Buckley states that Chomsky is being evasive I think he hit it on the nose. Chomsky kept digressing into areas he knew his opponent didn't know and thus the discussion kept trailing away from the original discussion which was has America ever interfered with a country for purely altruistic reasons. Chomsky says that has never been the case but Buckley gets him by pointing out that US and its allies invaded France. Chomsky tries to say it is different than the involvement in the Greek Civil War but Buckley points out that it really isn't. Chomsky is willing to say that the Vichy France (German controlled French puppet government) government was unlawful and should of been removed so the rightful French government can be reinstated. This is very similar to the US helping the anti-communists remove the Russian backed communist insurgents. Both instances have an invading foreign force trying to overthrow the government, and succeeded in the case of France, and the US comes in and helps the sovereign government remove the invaders. The problem is that Chomsky made a blanket statement which is always a bad idea when it comes to anything.