Should Sneaky Scumbag Spammer Self-Links Stay?
I just blacklisted long-time spammer @Sweetmind after finding compelling evidence against him, despite his having been a member for years and for earning himself several stars (via published videos). This is the second recent long-term spammer whose ass I've nailed to the wall, though I'm sure there are more waiting to be discovered.
I won't delve into the reasons I know he's a spammer, but because I know he is, I'm compelled to redact and kill all of his video submissions, despite that several did very well here.
Do you think all of his self-links should be redacted and killed? I really do, but I wonder if more of the community might feel they should stay because even though they're self-links the community actually liked them.
What are your thoughts on this situation?
8 Comments
VoodooVnuke em from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
antExecute order 66 on these spammers.
PlayhousePalsRules is rules dammit!
chingaleraLeave 'em by road and steal their boots..
MrFiskI can't believe Edward Snowden leaked this, too.
siftbotVoting for this poll ended with the majority of users voting Oh hells no, they're still self-links and they should not get anymore views from us!.
dagComment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
*unsticky
siftbotPost cannot be unstickied because it is not stickied - ignoring unsticky request by dag.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.