You don't know 'You'

this would be funny but it's Fox. not uncommon. confusion, lack of understanding, and unwillingness to listen or understand.
eric3579says...

This has to be a bit. He could have easily informed her that the title of the show was "you". I think many of us just love the idea that everyone at Fox is an idiot.

newtboysays...

I think “there’s a show called “you” on Netflix WAS informing her the title of the show was “you”, and she knows damn well her show is not on Netflix.

The problem is they’re not JUST idiots (proven time and time again, not just here) they’re insanely narcissistic, so even when you say “not you, a show called “you” on a network you aren’t on” they think “he’s talking about me and my show”.

Kinda a Q: “who’s on first”…A: ”so Laura Ingraham is on first?”

eric3579said:

This has to be a bit. He could have easily informed her that the title of the show was "you". I think many of us just love the idea that everyone at Fox is an idiot.

eric3579says...

After he said the show was on "you" three or four separate times, which makes all the difference. I'd buy it if he would have led with that, and why wouldn't you if you can see the confusion? I'm sticking with it being a bit.

newtboysaid:

I think “there’s a show called “you” on Netflix WAS informing her the title of the show was “you”

newtboysays...

There’s also that bit where “it’s on you” in no way means “it’s on YOUR show”. Should have been a hint to anyone who speaks non-pigeon-English. I thought he thought she just misheard, so he repeated.

But expecting Fox talking heads to understand plain English gives them too much credit. Edit: actually, expecting them to stop talking long enough to hear the answers to their questions is expecting too much. I think if she had listened, she would have understood.

I wish I could convince myself it was a bit, but I feel Laura isn’t that good of an actor, and her demeanor indicates she was being serious. I don’t want to think professional people are that clueless, but experience has made me believe they really are….but I freely admit it’s just my biased opinion…you of course are welcome to your own less jaded opinion, and I’ll just hope I’m wrong.

eric3579said:

After he said the show was on "you" three or four separate times, which makes all the difference. I'd buy it if he would have led with that, and why wouldn't you if you can see the confusion? I'm sticking with it being a bit.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More