Once those cameras go wireless, people would start uploading more of these?

bah...why the hell not

For the record, I fully expect this to be discussed, but my case is that it falls under educational and that it's actually really interesting. (It's not to stir up drama.)

The general tone of the video is documentary, and while it certainly is explicit, that's sorta the only way to show stuff like this - It can't be all Hollywood and fade to black.

Anyway, I hope you'll like it.

I dont know, it makes sense to me to... [eaaaaaagh!]... ummm, why the fuck is there dusgusting porn on vs?

He's obviously not turned on by POV porn....

@ForgedReality I just never realized that this much POV was actually a fetish. I think it's all weird, like the MRI sex we had here some where.

>> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ForgedReality" title="member since March 13th, 2009" class="profilelink">ForgedReality I just never realized that this much POV was actually a fetish. I think it's all weird, like the MRI sex we had here some where.

Okay, um... Did you actually go searching for that?

And to clarify, I was referring to the guy in the video. He's flaccid as a work glove.

edit - Do you realize how much of a huge pain in the ass it was to quote that just now? Good lord. It's bad enough that quotes show up UNDERNEATH the post... I wish VS would go back to the old way of quoting people.

edit2 - Fuck it. I can't get the goddamn quote to work, even though it shows up fine in the preview window. Retarded Videosift. >:[

The audio seems to skip a lot for me. Seems to be intentional editing but it's very irritating.

I only got a little way through before I decided that even in my relaxed workplace, that probably was too much.

I don't think the porno music helped...

And from what I saw it lacked a certain amount of actual real aim rather than thinking up an excuse to show porn.

I would say it doesn't belong... but it's a lineball...

I'd have to say it's going to fail Dag's wood test though.

This video needs some Price is Right sad horns at 5:17.

I would much rather have embedded the entire documentary, which I assume it is from, but I couldn't find it. It's true that this is edited to be in a pornographic manner, which is a shame.

>> ^spoco2:

I only got a little way through before I decided that even in my relaxed workplace, that probably was too much.
I don't think the porno music helped...
And from what I saw it lacked a certain amount of actual real aim rather than thinking up an excuse to show porn.
I would say it doesn't belong... but it's a lineball...
I'd have to say it's going to fail Dag's wood test though.

Lulz

Hmm.

It's definitely supposed to be educational, and in some parts..it kind of is..

But with all the editing going on, they get out half a sentance of something.. then it's just cut to another angle of people having sex.

Without the context of the entire Documentary, this kinda just seems like badly edited porn sequences.

I'll reserve my downvote, but that definitely doesn't pass any wood test of mine.

VS= my new favorite porn site.

also, at 4:55 why and how the hell is there a foot by her head??

Videosift is now accepting embeds from xvideos?

>> ^CheshireSmile:

VS= my new favorite porn site.
also, at 4:55 why and how the hell is there a foot by her head??

You're joking, right?

Nobody told you about the head/foot thing yet?

I dunno....to me it seems they edited this more to titillate than to educate, but then you are talking to a guy who gets off to the Sears catalog.

>> ^kronosposeidon:

I dunno....to me it seems they edited this more to titillate than to educate, but then you are talking to a guy who gets off to the Sears catalog.


Boys underwear section. Zing!

>> ^Shepppard:

Hmm.
It's definitely supposed to be educational, and in some parts..it kind of is..
But with all the editing going on, they get out half a sentance of something.. then it's just cut to another angle of people having sex.
Without the context of the entire Documentary, this kinda just seems like badly edited porn sequences.
I'll reserve my downvote, but that definitely doesn't pass any wood test of mine.


I gotta side with Shepp on this one. They have edited the living shit out of this and it was pretty annoying to get half-sentences all the way through it... Given that the source seems to be a site with "porn" in the title, seems pretty obvious they have edited it with that in mind.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

*discuss for the obvious reasons.

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by dag.

I find this video interesting and informative, however I can see how it might cross the line for some people. (sorry gwiz)

Edit: after watching this video a ...second time, I'm certain the original doc was edited together to be a little more porny. Perhaps this embed could be replaced with one *sigh* a little less... fun?

>> ^dag:

discuss for the obvious reasons.

If this were replaced with the original documentary, I'd have no problem with this, but again, as I stated, the editing seems to remove any educational merit this had.

>> ^Shepppard:

If this were replaced with the original documentary, I'd have no problem with this, but again, as I stated, the editing seems to remove any educational merit this had.


Yup, I agree. Find the original and I'm fine with it, this is highly edited and is being embedded from an all-out porn site.

Then again, I did upvote it

@ponceleon I'm looking for it!

It shouldn't matter where it is embedded from though.

It's early morning here, and my morals are still asleep. Which means I really don't care.

I, admittedly, tend to be more liberal and less puritanical about this sort of thing, but I'm for it. Yes, there is obvious, unfortunate editing for pornographic purposes, but watching the anatomy at work is still informative, even if the rest of it is lost. Consider this a more focused study on just the anatomical points. I'm just really glad that it wasn't filmed in 3-D!

I suck dicks for *promotes (click here if you want some)

kulpims cannot promote this post because kulpims does not have enough Power Points - ignoring promote request by kulpims. (You can always purchase more Power Points.)

No no, I agree that the source shouldn't be an issue, but in this case it is definitely a very big clue as to why it was edited like it was...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I think the consensus is that this should go. It's "eduPorn" which really is still porn. Not my cup of tea - I can report complete flaccidity (could be the red wine) - but it still needs to go.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

*discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by member dag.

@dag fair enough. I can understand the general consensus that it's cut like a porno "if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck.." etc. I'll try to find the entire documentary and sift that instead when I find it.

This is probably a better version.

Sorry Gwiz, I'd actually probably enjoy seeing the full documentary of this, should it ever be found.

It's actually a BBC production, "A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex". You /might/ still find the DVDs for sale.

this turned me on lmao i got my husband and fucked him hard and good

Mmmm, mmm, soooo freaky-sexy

You spanked and sexed his bottom???? Yaaahh goot, spank those nasty backside...

I dont know if anyone has said this, but this is from A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex

Pretty much what I expected.
Btw, the tip of the penis isn't touched by vagina... poor penis tip