Airborne Helium Wind Turbine Prototype 2012

First public video of the 35-foot-wide Airborne Wind Turbine. The scale prototype harnessed strong winds up to 350 feet high to produce over twice the power of traditional wind turbines.

http://www.altaerosenergies.com
lampishthingsays...

A common final year exam question (one of the short questions on one paper) in our physics dept is "would it be possible to power Ireland solely on Wind energy given that total consumption is x KWh". There's one professor who hates and derides wind energy and keeps throwing it in. The basic outline solution is that even if there were turbines on every step of the coastline you still wouldn't create enough energy.

I bet the bastard never thought of helium. Hah!

messengersays...

I wonder how closely together these things can be safely and effectively bunched. If it's better than mounted turbines, this could be good. Something tells me they have to be really far apart so their tethers don't get entangled.

zorsays...

>> ^sillma:

What a waste of perfectly good helium.


Right. Helium is not a good choice. Should have used hydrogen because it's renewable. They can use the energy to make more from water and if it explodes no harm no foul since there are no people on board.

brycewi19says...

I've heard that helium is getting quite expensive. Something about supply being limited.

Wouldn't that have to factor in to the feasibility of this being financially practical?

entr0pysays...

>> ^zor:

>> ^sillma:
What a waste of perfectly good helium.

Right. Helium is not a good choice. Should have used hydrogen because it's renewable. They can use the energy to make more from water and if it explodes no harm no foul since there are no people on board.


But a 35 foot wide burning anything crashing to the earth has got to be bothersome.

conansays...

i'm not sold on the concept. "twice the power of a tower mounted turbine"? but this one has a puny little rotor, whereas the bigges turbines have a rotor alone of more than 400ft in diameter. and this little thing only floats 1000ft in the air (at least they plan to do so, only having achieved 350ft up until now). granted, there's surely more wind "up there" but then what? compare a 400ft rotor (the whole thing is 600ft in total height) to this little plastic sucker in 1000ft? the E-126 turbine i'm taling about generates 6MW. i want to see 12MW coming out of this little blimp thing :-)

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More